Rosettatype’s avatarRosettatype’s Twitter Archive—№ 4,391

  1. …in reply to @justvanrossum
    @justvanrossum Considering that we don’t have a universal measure of legibility, we ought to consider all claims regarding legibility equally valid or equally invalid.
    1. …in reply to @rosettatype
      @justvanrossum * general claims! Obviously we do have specific measures and results for specific situations.
    2. …in reply to @rosettatype
      @justvanrossum However, I agree with your scepticism and see a different issue with making type bigger for optical size variation and that is the ability to change font size independently. It’s confounding two kinds of control for type. (this is out of context for the original discussion)